Feedback that points at the frame.

Review is where your agency leaks the most time. Vague notes in a chat thread, three files named final, and nobody sure which cut a comment was about. ContentWorkflow pins every note to the exact moment it is about, on videos and on statics.

On the timeline, not in a thread.

Video notes land on a timestamp, image notes land on the file, and every note stays attached to the version it was made on.

Comments on the timestamp

Leave a note at 0:14 and it stays pinned there. Click it and the player jumps to the frame.

Voice notes

Record the note instead of typing it when the point is easier said than written.

Attachments

Drop a reference image or file onto a comment so the fix is unambiguous.

A version per cut

Upload v1, v2, v3. Comments stay attached to the cut they were made on, so nothing gets re-litigated.

Resolve and filter

Tick off what you fixed and filter to what is left. Outstanding work is a list, not a re-read.

Approve or send back

A reviewer approves the cut or requests changes, and the pipeline stage moves with the decision.

The client side.

A reviewer needs to watch and comment. Nothing else.

Share links, revocable

Create a link per cut and revoke it when the job is done. The link is the only credential, so there is no account to create and no seat to pay for.

Uploads up to 512 MB

Versions upload straight from the browser. Larger cuts go through a direct upload rather than the server, so the limit is the file, not the request.

See how this fits the rest of the workflow on the features page.

Replaces Frame.io, and the chat thread you were pasting timecodes into.

Every plan includes it, and client reviewers are always free.