The conversation, next to the work.

Review comments belong to a cut. Everything else, the brief, the scheduling change, the question about next month, lives in a chat app with no idea which client it is about. Discussions is the thread that knows.

What it will do.

Scoped to the client or project it belongs to, and visible to exactly the people who can already see that work.

A thread per client and project

Conversation filed where the work is, so a question about one brand is never in the same list as another.

Team and client in one place

Clients see the threads on their own work and nothing else, with the same scoping the rest of the app already enforces.

Mentions

Pull someone in by name and it reaches them through the notifications that already exist.

Why it is separate from review comments.

Two different jobs, and merging them makes both worse.

Comments point at a frame

They are pinned to a timestamp on a version, they get resolved, and they disappear when the cut ships. That is the right shape for a note about a frame and the wrong shape for a conversation.

Discussions carry the conversation

They outlive any one cut, they are never resolved, and they belong to the client rather than the file.

See how this fits the rest of the workflow on the features page.

Replaces a Slack channel per client, and the DMs that end up carrying the actual decisions.

On the Studio plan and up. Client reviewers are always free.